Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Cremer, D.
Right arrow Articles by van Dijk, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 11, No. 3, 355-369 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430208090647

Leader—Follower Effects in Resource Dilemmas: The Roles of Leadership Selection and Social Responsibility

David De Cremer

Tilburg University, d.decremer{at}uvt.nl

Eric van Dijk

Leiden University-Institute for Psychological Research

Previous research on the allocation of scarce resources shows that when people are assigned labels of leader or follower in their group, leaders allocate more of the scarce resources to themselves than followers do. In three laboratory studies, we examine the idea that how people are selected for the leader role (i.e. election or appointment) determines whether leaders take more or equal shares (relative to followers) from a common resource. In a first experiment, we show that participants were more accepting of norm violating behavior by an appointed versus elected leader. In a second experiment, we show that when participants were assigned to a leader or follower role, allocations of appointed leaders differed significantly from those of elected leaders and followers, whereas there was no difference between the two latter conditions. Moreover, elected leaders were shown to feel more social responsibility than both appointed leaders and followers. In a final experiment, we show that when participants were primed with the concept of social responsibility (relative to a neutral condition) no difference in allocations between appointed and elected leaders emerged.

Key Words: followers • leadership selection • resource allocations • resource dilemmas • social responsibility

References

  • Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
  • Allison, S.T., & Messick, D.M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 195-204.
  • Ben-Yoav, O., Hollander, E.P., & Carnevale, P.J.D. (1983). Leader legitimacy, leader-follower interaction, and followers' ratings of the leader. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 111-115.[ISI]
  • Chemers, M.M. (2001). Leadership effectiveness: An integrative review. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 376-399). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., & Reno, R.R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-234). New York: Academic Press.
  • Cohen, A.M., & Bennis, W.G. (1961). Continuity of leadership in communication networks. Human Relations, 14, 351-367.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • De Cremer, D. (2001). Effects of roles and performance feedback on the equality-rule in resource-sharing tasks. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 153-155.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • De Cremer, D. (2002). Charismatic leadership and cooperation in social dilemmas: A matter of transforming motives? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 997-1016.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • De Cremer, D. (2003a). How self-conception may lead to inequality: Effect of hierarchical roles on the equality-rule in organizational resource-sharing tasks. Group and Organization Management, 28, 282-302.[CrossRef]
  • De Cremer, D. (2003b). Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: The importance of social self-esteem concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 535-550.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behavior in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 553-563.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858-866.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The role of responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, 5-18.[CrossRef]
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Epley, N., & Caruso, E.M. (2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research, 17, 171-187.[CrossRef]
  • Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., & Nisbett, R.E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 915-981). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fiske, S.T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds), Annual review of psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • Greenleaf, R.K., & Spears, L.C. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness [25th anniversary edition]. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
  • Haslam, S.A., McGarty, C., Brown, P.M., Eggins, R.A., Morrison, B.E., & Reynolds, K.J. (1998). Inspecting the emperor's clothes: Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 168-184.[CrossRef]
  • Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
  • Hollander, E.P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
  • Hollander, E.P. (1992). Leadership, followership, self, and others. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 43-54.[CrossRef]
  • Hollander, E.P., & Julian, J.W. (1970). Studies in leader legitimacy, influence, and innovation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 33-69.[CrossRef]
  • Julian, J.W., Hollander, E.P., & Regula, C.R. (1969). Endorsement of the group spokesman as a function of his source of authority, competence and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 42-49.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Academic Press.
  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kenney, R.A., Schwartz-Kenney, B.M., & Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1128-1143.[Abstract]
  • Lord, R.G., Foti, R.J., & de Vader, C.L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Mannix, E.A. (1993). Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 1-22.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Messé, L.A., Kerr, N.L., & Sattler, D.N. (1992). `But some animals are more equal than others': The supervisor as a privileged status in group contexts. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group processes and productivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Neely, J.H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 106, 226-254.[ISI]
  • Phillips, J.S., & Lord, R.G. (1982). Schematic information processing and perception of leadership in problem solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 486-492.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Samuelson, C.D., & Allison, S.T. (1994). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 1-27.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Schwinghammer, S.A., Stapel, D.A., & Blanton, H. (2006). Different selves have different effects: Self-activation and defensive social comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 27-39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Sedikides, C. (1995). Central and peripheral self-conceptions are differentially influenced by mood: Tests of the differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 759-777.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). I'm doing the best I can (for myself): Leadership and variance of harvesting in social dilemmas. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 205-211.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Tyler, T.R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tyler, T.R., & Huo, Y.J. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell-Sage.
  • Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Selfbenefiting behavior in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower differences and the moderating effect of social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1352-1361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Van Lange, P.A.M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Vescio, T.K., Gervais, S.J., Heidenreich, S., & Snyder, M. (2006). The effects of prejudice level and social influence strategy on powerful people's responding to racial out-group members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 435-450.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Walster, E., Berscheid, G.W., & Walster, G.W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Cremer, D.
Right arrow Articles by van Dijk, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?